Darwin dedicated his entire life in studying the theory of evolution and all the other associated theories. His contribution to the science of biology is immense, and even today, his theory of natural selection is the most respected theory of all.
It is a very interesting story about human nature. When the Emperor parades around in clothes that are invisible no one says anything because everybody thinks that if they cannot see the clothes that they are stupid, ignorant, or insane.
The farce continues until a child exclaims, "The Emperor has no clothes! The theory of evolution has become so popular and so pervasive that it is difficult for anyone to question it without being branded as, "ignorant, stupid, or insane. What is wrong with me?
Some might suggest that I am too biased by my upbringing or religious background to see the truth of the theory of evolution. Certainly it is true that I am human, prone to bias. But, at least I am aware of this and really do desire to know the truth - wherever it may lead. I am a firm believer in the scientific method and in its power to increase human knowledge of all knowable truth concerning the world outside the mind - to include "religious" ideas when those ideas make some sort of claim about some force acting on physical things around or within us with intelligent or deliberate intent.
Interestingly enough though, the scientific method does not detect truth directly. The power of the scientific method comes from its ability to detect error, thereby limiting the places where truth may be found.
Since no theory is ever fully proven by the scientific method, no one should ever consider any theory or even "fact" above all question. When a theory or interpretation can no longer be questioned, it leaves the realm of science and moves into the realm of holy, untouchable, religious dogma.
Often the thought crosses my mind that scientists are just as fervent and religious in their thinking as any other church-going community.
The only difference is the object of worship. I'm not saying that a little religious zeal is a bad thing - even for scientists.
Many truths are very important and should be defended. However, human ideas of "truth" are not or at least should not be above all question. In fact, truth is made all the more clear when it is challenged. Why then does it seem like many scientists defend their ideas of naturalism and the theory of evolution as if their lives and very souls depended on it?
The dedication of the scientific community at large to these ideas is generally no less dogmatic and passionate than the religious fervor of the most hardened sectarian fundamentalist.
And yet, the scientific method really does not support the use of any "a priori" assumptions when evaluating the potential truthfulness of any hypothesis or theory.
The position that the mindless non-deliberate processes of nature are the only types of potentially "natural" forces that can possibly be considered when it comes to explaining the origin and diversity of life on this planet is not a requirement of the scientific method, but is rather a philosophical position.
It all boils down to what scientists define as "natural" verses "supernatural". The funny thing is, scientists do theorize the involvement of intelligent minds all the time when it comes to forensic investigations or searches for extraterrestrial intelligence - since these intelligences would be "natural".
Why then is the origin of life any different? Upon what basis are all considerations of the workings of an intelligent mind excluded, without any consideration whatsoever, when it comes to determining the origin and diversity of life on this planet? Isn't it at least theoretically possible that some very intelligent yet "natural" mind might have been behind the origin of life on this planet?
How is this possibility beyond the realm of scientific investigation? Consider the form of a humble amorphous rock.
Does its form give evidence of deliberate design over a mindless cause? Humans are in fact capable of designing amorphous rocks, but so are very lowly mindless randomly acting natural processes.
The same is true if I were to walk by a house in the morning and see that it had a broken window. In this case I could quite rationally hypothesize either a mindless non-deliberate cause i. However, if I were to walk by that same house later in the day and find that this same window had been repaired, how easy would it be for me to hypothesize a random mindless process as a cause?
The same thing could be said for analyzing symmetrically intricate crop circles in England or a box of otherwise identical red and white marbles where all the red marbles are on the same side of the box.Read The Whole Page First The idea of evolution is a simple one.
Things change. Right now we're just talking about the word, not the philosophical idea. The process of cars changing over the past years can be thought of as an evolution in ashio-midori.com an organism changes over many generations, it might be better suited to live, or more likely to die.
Darwin's Theory of Evolution - Natural Selection While Darwin's Theory of Evolution is a relatively young archetype, the evolutionary worldview itself is as old as antiquity. Ancient Greek philosophers such as Anaximander postulated the development of life from non-life and the evolutionary descent of .
Natural selection, he explains, simply "cannot be the primary engine of evolution". I got up and refilled my cup. But by the time I returned, his argument had slipped from my grasp. the theory of evolution by natural selection of those species best adapted to survive the struggle for existence.
— Darwinian, n., ad). Evolution And Natural Selection Are Related Essay - Darwinian evolution is the theory of biological evolution stating that all species of organisms arise and develop through the natural selection of small, inherited variations that increase the individual’s ability to compete, survive and reproduce.
British naturalist who proposed the theory of evolution based on natural selection (). Darwin's theory, that random variation of traits within an individual species can lead to the development of new species, revolutionized the study of biology.